EB-5 Fraud: Immigration Lawyer and his Firm to Pay $2.7 Million

July 19, 2017

Action Immigration

There was some big trouble in store for a New York-based immigration lawyer and his agency with California federal court passing a ruling on Thursday on EB-5 investments. It declared that these investments are essentially securities and must be subject to the standard broker-dealer legislation. This announcement led to the firm paying $2.7 million because it was carrying out operations as unauthorized broker-dealers, hence fooling nationals from China trying to get visas.


Defrauding Chinese nationals seeking permanent residency


Feng and his law firm were asked to pay more than $1.7 million (disgorgement plus interest) along with a combined civil penalty of $960,000. A legal case was filed against Feng by SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) in December 2015. It had also sent out orders to six other lawyers who had been involved in similar frauds with regards to EB-5 investments.


The lawyers were representing individuals who were looking to participate in the immigrant investor program of the government. This program provides Eb-5 visas to non-residents who make an investment of a minimum of $1 million in some commercial project (the minimum investment limit may be reduced to $50,000 in special cases). These commercial projects should help create/sustain a minimum of ten full-time jobs.


Feng’s argument against the Ruling


In the month of February, Feng made a motion for summary judgment and said that the EB-5 investments in question aren’t securities since the law requires such instruments to give profits to investors. He added that the biggest worry of his Chinese national clients was to get visas. They weren’t expecting any returns on the project investments. This argument was rejected by Judge Marshall who said that the investments were done with the aim of generating profits. It did not matter if getting a U.S. residency was also one of the motivations.


According to Judge Marshall, clear evidence is offered by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the defendants deliberately concealed the receipt of investment commission since they wanted to avoid negotiation with the clients with regards to rebating commission portions.


Feng’s counsel, Andrew B. Holmes Taylor Scott & Jones LLP, was recently reported saying that they were expecting the ruling of Judge Marshall very soon. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has refrained from commenting on the anticipated litigation. Attorneys Megan M. Bergstrom and Donald Searles are representing the SEC.

Disclaimer - This is the website of ACTION Immigration Bonds & Insurance Services, Inc. Our postal address is 1133 SE 3rd Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 USA. Our toll free number is 1-800-940-8889. Each visitor to our website is assured that at no time will any of the information gathered here or by any other means be sold, distributed or otherwise given to any third party companies for any reason. Any information that we may collect is used solely by ACTION to improve our website, our services, product offerings and customer service. We do not make the email addresses, domain names or any other information of those who access our site available to any organizations not owned by ACTION Immigration Bonds & Insurance Services, Inc. Real testimonials used. Actor portrayal of customer used to protect their identity. REFERRAL COMMISSIONS ARE PAID ONLY TO PROPERLY LICENSED PROPERTY & CASUALTY AGENTS. NO COMMISSIONS ARE PAID TO AGENTS IN THE STATE OF UTAH.

Action Immigration Bonds and Insurance Services, Inc. charges a yearly management / maintenance premium of $245.00 and NO management premium in CA if case goes beyond 1 year.

© 2024. Action Immigration Bonds and Insurance Services, Inc.